A few days ago, I saw a post shared by Yu Bo on Google Reader - the impact of empty paths on page performance. Indeed, when writing CSS, using background:url(#) will still make an extra request to the page. However, because we write a lot of CSS, we usually need to use an empty background to solve bugs. The test results show that using background:url(about:blank) is what we want: solving bugs without affecting performance. That's simple, isn't there a solution? Wait, let's do a test. Copy code The code is as follows:<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang=""> <head> <meta charset="utf-8" /> <title>empty src</title> <style>body{font-family:courier, 'courier new';}code{background:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:0 3px;-moz-border-radius:2px;-webkit-border-radius:2px;border-radius:2px;font-size:12px;color:#080;}p{font-size:12px;color:#999;}cite{font-size:14px;color:#c30;}</style> </head> <body> <h3>1. Send a request:</h3> <p>Browser: <code>All</code>, some browsers like <code>Chrome</code>, <code>hash(#)</code> and empty will only request this path</p> <ol> <li><img src="" alt="empty image src"/></li> <li><div style="background:url(#background)">Background images use <code>background:url(#)</code> and also send a request</div></li> <li><img src="#image" alt="image src using hash(#)"></li> <li><img src="http://www.apple.com/favicon.ico" /></li> </ol> <h3>2. Partial sending request:</h3> <p>Browser (very small delay): <code>Safari</code>, <code>Chrome (multiple about:blank will send multiple requests)</code></p> <cite>Use <code>about:blank</code></cite> <ol> <li><img src="about:blank" alt="empty image src"/></li> <li><div style="background:url(about:blank)">hello world</div></li> <li><code><iframe /></code><iframe src="javascript:''" frameborder="0" height="15"></iframe></li> </ol> <h3>2. Do not send a request:</h3> <p>Browser: <code>all</code>, <code>chrome (delay is invalid, equivalent to not sending a request)</code></p> <cite>Use <code>javascript:''</code></cite> <ol> <li><img src="javascript:''" alt="empty image src"/></li> <li><code><script /></code> <script type="text/javascript" src="javascript:''"></script></li> <li><code><iframe /></code><iframe src="javascript:''" frameborder="0" height="15"></iframe></li> </ol> </body> </html> I'm too lazy to take screenshots, so just try it yourself. The browsing results are roughly written on the test page. The final solution was: Feel free to use about:blank instead of empty space or '#', especially in background-image. In img/script/iframe, it is recommended to use javascript:" to solve the problem. Any other better way? Is there any problem with this test result? Feel free to provide and correct it. Thank you. |
<<: MySQL Series 14 MySQL High Availability Implementation
>>: Nginx solves cross-domain issues and embeds third-party pages
Table of contents 1. Overview 2. Download the Ngi...
Table of contents 1. Introduction to sysbench #Pr...
Table of contents Overview File Descriptors Synch...
The default storage directory of mysql is /var/li...
Previous words Line-height, font-size, and vertica...
Table of contents JS obtains the .txt file conten...
Drop-shadow and box-shadow are both CSS propertie...
FFMPEG 3.4.1 version parameter details Usage: ffm...
Understanding object.defineProperty to achieve re...
1. Check whether MySQL is installed yum list inst...
Table of contents Preface 1. Startup management b...
We better start paying attention, because HTML Po...
Please handle basic operations such as connecting...
Distinguish the differences between the filter, f...
1. What is HTML markup language? HTML is a markup...